Archive for 'software'

AutoCrit Review

I heard about AutoCrit from Marie-Claude Bourque. So I've decided to try it.

For those of you who aren't aware, AutoCrit is a brainchild of Nina Davies. She has two books published with Wings ePress and Cobblestone Press. (Dream Gypsy, which is listed under her “Books” hasn't been published as far as I know.) She's also an editor, though I don't know who she edits for or what authors she's worked with.

Anyway…back to AutoCrit

The website claims:

If you are writing a book, the AutoCrit Editing Wizard will dramatically improve your manuscript. I guarantee it.

Unfortunately I think the claim that AutoCrit “will dramatically improve your manuscript” is somewhat exaggerated. If you're an intermediate to advanced writer with decent line-editing skill, AutoCrit won't do much for you. But if you're fairly new and/or terrible at line-editing, it'll be a valuable tool until you're no longer a beginner.

AutoCrit will not help you identify character issues, plot holes or the general flow. It won't help you with punctuation either. It's meant to be a mechanical tool designed to help you identify basic line-edit problems involving repeated words and phrases.

It also cannot be installed on your computer. So you have to continue to pay for your membership so long as you want to use it. But as I said, it's only good for beginners, and I think most people will grow out of AutoCrit within a year or two at the most.

Free Reports —

Overused Words Report:

It's pretty basic and checks for the number of times you've used the following words (only):

  • could
  • feel/feeling/felt
  • had
  • have
  • hear/heard
  • initial conjunction
  • initial ing
  • it/there
  • just/then
  • knew/know
  • look
  • ly adverbs
  • maybe
  • smell/taste
  • that
  • was/were
  • watch/notice/observe

It highlights the ones it thinks you've overused and advises you on what to do with instructions like: Remove about 4 occurrences.

Repeated Phrases Report:

This report looks for repeated phrases. It's slightly different from repeated words since it looks for groups of words that have been repeated.

Sentence Length Variation:

It basically draws a bar graph with dots to illustrate how many words you've used on each sentence. It may be fun to view, but it did absolutely nothing for me since my sentence length is all over the place, so it's not like I'm going to go back and try to change anything. This is useful for people who write a lot of sentences with a similar number of words back to back. Otherwise not that useful.

Paid Reports (Orange) — To view these, you need to have at least the Gold membership.

Repeated Words Report:

This is pretty useful because it highlights words that you've repeated too closely together. But again if you're a decent line editor, you won't find it all that helpful.

The report just highlights the words, and it's up to you to figure out how to fix them (or decide if you even want to do anything about them in the first place).

Dialogue Tags Report:

This is completely useless to almost all intermediate to advanced writers, who won't write tags like “He ejaculated!”. It just highlights dialogue tags like “he said” and so on. Not very helpful unless you tag every dialogue, in which case you need to study some how-to books on dialogue.

First Words Report:

Shows the first word of each sentence. Again, not very helpful unless you have a nasty habit of starting most of your sentences with the same word.

Names and Pronouns Report:

This highlights proper names and pronouns. Not very helpful for writers with a basic grasp of grammar. This is for people who have some serious issues with syntax, in which case, IMO they ought to be reading Strunk and White.

Repeated Phrases Summary Report:

This merely lists the phrases you've repeated and the number of times you've repeated them. No highlights. I'm not sure what purpose this report serves, especially if you've already addressed the issue in the free repeated phrases report.

Combination View of Overused & Repeated Words Report:

This merely highlights overused and repeated words in ONE report. Nothing new.

Paid Reports (Blue) — To view these, you must buy the Platinum membership.

Cliché Finder Report:

I had really high hopes for this one, but this report didn't find that many clichés. I have no idea how many are in the database, but seriously, you're better off looking for them yourself.

Redundancy Finder Report:

This report shows things like “stand up” or “sit down”, with the remark that “up” or “down” respectively are redundant. It may be, but sometimes it's a stylistic choice.

Homonym Highlighter:

For people with a good grasp of English, this report is virtually useless. But if you're struggling with “they're”, “there” and “their”, this will probably help.

Readability Suite:

MS Word already has this function built-in. It basically checks for how “readable” your manuscript is, using the formula based on the number of words in a sentence and the number of syllables per word. It won't look for whether or not your story is gripping or interesting or whatever. Moderately helpful.

Pacing Monitor:

This works for stories written in 3rd person POV in past tense only. It highlights parts that are “descriptive” or “introspective” and so on. To be honest, I don't think this is useful at all except for beginners. You're better off doing Margie Lawson‘s EDITS on your manuscript to address pacing issues.

***** ***** *****

Professional membership BTW doesn't allow you any more reports. You can upload your entire manuscript in one file, instead of having to copy paste.

The only paid report that I found somewhat useful was the repeated words report. The rest are more or less time-wasters (for me personally). But beginner writers may find AutoCrit a valuable tool.

If you want to try it out, feel free. You can get full refund so long as you cancel within thirty days, no questions asked. (I've tried it already.)

I have two coupon codes for AutoCrit:

  • twitter —> 10% off
  • fb5010 —> 50% off (I have no idea when it's going to expire, but it's not going to be valid much longer…)

My Impression of WriteWayPro

A couple of people asked me if I've ever used WriteWayPro and if so, what I think of it.

It's my fourth day using the program. I think it's a fine program, and it does what you want it to do.

Strengths:

  • Everything you need for your writing project is right there on the screen, so it's very easy to keep things organized.
  • It's very easy to move scenes around or reference certain scenes, etc.
  • It starts fast.
  • You can set it to open to your last active chapter or scene, so you can start working right away.
  • It's not that difficult to learn.
  • Customer support is great. I've seen some really crappy customer support, but this is excellent. I'm happy with the response time and so on.
  • Word count report and analysis are fabulous. I love looking at them and see how many words I need to write to hit my target completion date, etc. (I no longer need to mess with Excel, although I adore Excel…)

Things WriteWayPro can improve on:

  • It's currently lacking auto-save, so you have to remember to save every so often.
  • The composition screen shouldn't be in print layout (to use Wordspeak). It's a personal preference, but I find it very distracting to see empty headers and footers as I go from one page to the next. Since the composition font and the final manuscript font are different anyway (and lovely WriteWayPro formats everything for you automatically!), I don't see any point to having a ton of blank space on the screen. Besides, it really breaks the flow as I draft and/or edit. I wish I could hide the blank space like in Word.
  • I'm not sure if it's just me or Word 2007 or what, but when I export the entire manuscript into rtf and open it in Word, the text looks justified, and the right side is smooth instead of jagged. But if I copy paste the entire manuscript to another blank Word doc, the format comes out fine. It's not a deal breaker, but it's something to be aware of if this kind of stuff really really matters to you.
  • Unlike Word, which can check for typos as you type, WriteWayPro checks typos only if you click on the spell-check button. I find this to be somewhat annoying because I like to fix typos as I draft / edit.
  • This didn't bug me, but it may bug you: the user interface is very basic and not as polished and fancy as the latest Microsoft Office. But it does the job, and I don't think it's something WriteWayPro should put any priority on addressing. If you simply must have the slickest GUI, however, this may bother you.

So there it is. Any questions? Have you used WriteWayPro or any similar software? If so, what do you think about it? If you've never used any, why not?

So the FTC doesn't come after me, here it is again: I'm not in any way shape or form related to or employed by WriteWayPro. I never received any monetary compensation for this post. I've downloaded WriteWayPro, and I am currently drafting my novel with it.


Great Deal for Writers Using Windows

Scrivener has a deal for NaNo, but they don't offer a Windows version. For those of us who use Windows, we're SOL.

Well…not really. ;)

If you want something similar for Windows, try WriteWayPro. You can download the demo and try it out for thirty days. I've heard good things about it from a lot of writers, including Larissa Ione. Also, it was created by Lara Adrian‘s hubby, so it's much more writer-friendly than many other programs out there. WriteWayPro is also on Twitter, and I found them (him?) to be very responsive.

There's also a special coupon code valid until November 30, 2009: $20 off the WriteWayPro download version. Just type NANO-PRO20 when you check out.

Disclaimer: I'm not in any way, shape or form related to or employed by WriteWayPro. I haven't received any monetary compensation for this post. I have, however, downloaded WriteWayPro, and am currently drafting my novel with it.